1
Priority 01
Housing & Urban Recovery
Restoring safe, durable housing and urban services through standards-based delivery.
Housing programme →International Reconstruction Authority
A Permanent International Authority for Structured Reconstruction
Governance, infrastructure, and capital architecture for national-scale reconstruction — built for continuity and international coordination.
No solicitation of funds. No binding commitments.
Institutional Snapshot
Executive briefing — operational framework (non-financial).
0
Year horizon
0
Published standards
0
Pipeline stages
0
Regional jurisdictions
- Institutional status
- Independent International Reconstruction Authority
Key operating facts
- Independent non-profit reconstruction authority
- Governance separated from delivery
- Public land, public benefit
- Standards adopted and versioned
- Capital deployed through ring-fenced entities
Institutional safeguards
Structured for permanence
-
Governance by design
Separated oversight, ethics, and delivery — non-capture architecture.
Authority & Governance → -
Transparency & reporting
Open accountability, procurement discipline, and audit-ready documentation.
Reporting & Accountability → -
Operational frameworks
Capital flows, standards, and continuity pathways under one institutional system.
Institutional Documents →
Our priorities
Strategic Reconstruction Priorities
The Authority organises recovery work around clear public-interest priorities: programmes, regions, standards, transparency, and institutional continuity.
1
2
Priority 02
Energy & Utilities
Rebuilding power, utilities, and resilience systems under transparent technical frameworks.
Energy programme →
3
Priority 03
Transport & Connectivity
Supporting movement of people, goods, and essential services across recovery corridors.
Transport programme →
4
Priority 04
Regional reconstruction
Connecting national recovery priorities with regional needs, profiles, and delivery status.
Explore map →
5
Priority 05
Standards & procurement
Using published standards, procurement discipline, and oversight to reduce delivery risk.
Standards library →
6
Priority 06
Governance & accountability
Separating governance, capital, and delivery so reconstruction remains auditable.
Governance model →Reconstruction in context
The scale of the challenge
- $524B
- Estimated cost of Ukraine’s reconstruction and recovery over the next decade.
- €50B
- EU Ukraine Facility to support recovery, investment, and reforms.
- 24
- Regional jurisdictions shown in the reconstruction map and regional profiles.
- 15
- Published standards in the baseline reconstruction standards index.
Source: Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment — Government of Ukraine, World Bank, EU, UN (2025)
Source: European Commission — Ukraine Facility, 2024–2027
Source: Authority regional framework (illustrative)
Source: Authority standards library (illustrative v1.0)
Figures from cited external sources are provided for context and do not represent the Authority’s commitments or financials.
Institutional delivery
From recovery needs to governed public assets
This block connects visible reconstruction work with the institutional controls behind it: assessment, approval, delivery oversight, and public accountability.
- 01 Assess recovery needs Regional and sector priorities are documented before capital or procurement decisions.
- 02 Approve the framework Governance, eligibility, and standards checks define what can proceed.
- 03 Deliver under oversight Projects move through ring-fenced delivery with reporting and audit visibility.
Governance Architecture
Reconstruction requires institutional architecture. Governance, capital, and delivery are structurally separated.
Select a layer to highlight the governance stack
Swipe horizontally to explore the diagram
Separation by Design
- No single party controls governance, capital, and delivery.
- Mandatory external audits and ethics oversight.
- Delivery is isolated via ring-fenced project entities.
Version 1.0 · Last updated: May 2026 · Next governance review: 2027
Leadership & accountability
Led by experience, accountable to an independent board
An executive team runs day-to-day reconstruction operations under the direction and scrutiny of an independent Oversight Board. Governance is deliberately separated from delivery.
Illustrative content — names and portraits are placeholders for layout and will be replaced with the appointed board and advisory members once confirmed.
Capital architecture
How Capital Flows
Reconstruction at national scale requires a disciplined capital architecture that separates risk, control, and delivery. The Authority exists to provide that structure.
Capital Architecture in Five Steps
A compact view of how capital moves from policy alignment to public-purpose assets. The full explanation remains on the dedicated Capital Flows page.
Control principle
Capital, governance, delivery, and asset control remain structurally separated.
-
01EU risk-sharing
EU Risk-Sharing & Policy Alignment
The European Union provides policy alignment and risk-sharing instruments, reducing exposure and enabling scale.
-
02IFI anchor capital
Multilateral Anchor Capital
Multilateral institutions provide senior capital under established due-diligence frameworks.
-
03Authority governance
Authority as Central Counterparty
The Authority acts as a single, governed counterparty, separating capital from political and operational risk.
-
04Ring-fenced SPVs
Ring-Fenced Project Entities
Capital is deployed into legally and financially ring-fenced project entities for programmes and assets.
-
05Public assets
Assets & Public Reversion
Assets serve public benefit and, where applicable, revert to public ownership under concession or BOT frameworks.
Capital does not control governance. Governance does not execute delivery. Delivery does not control assets.
Geographic mandate
Where We Work
The Authority’s primary mandate is the reconstruction of Ukraine. Projects are delivered on public or publicly mandated land, under transparent long-term use agreements, ensuring assets serve public benefit and remain aligned with national priorities.
- Current delivery across multiple regions of Ukraine
- Expansion framework for Eastern Europe and EU neighbourhood
- Public-interest land use and asset reversion model
Ukraine
Programme status by region — tap to select. Link opens the reconstruction profile.
View reconstruction profile →
Live activity
Reconstruction activity at a glance
A live operational snapshot of regions, programmes and partner engagement as the Authority moves from institutional formation to delivery.
En direct · Mis à jour 28 Jun 2026
- 8+
- Regions actively engaged
- 24+
- Active programme areas
- 12+
- Partner organisations in dialogue
- 6+
- Opportunities open to partners
Illustrative operational figures shown during institutional formation. They do not represent confirmed commitments and will be replaced with verified live data as programmes are activated.
Pipeline & Opportunities
Future reconstruction opportunities by region and sector
A forward view of reconstruction works for engineering firms, contractors and investors — by region and sector. Stage-based visibility; no financial amounts or contractor names.
- 1Expression of interest
- 2Technical assessment
- 3Governance review
- 4Capital structuring
- 5Delivery phase
Programme
Housing Recovery — Kharkiv Region
Technical assessment
Residential reconstruction and energy-efficient retrofitting.
Programme
Municipal Water Infrastructure — Kherson Region
Expression of interest
Water supply, wastewater and flood-resilient drainage.
Programme
Energy Grid Reinforcement — Dnipropetrovsk Region
Governance review
Substation rebuilds and grid resilience for industry.
Programme
Transport Corridor Restoration — Odesa Region
Expression of interest
Road, bridge and port-access corridor rehabilitation.
Institutional entry
Engagement Pathways
Separate institutional entry routes for public authorities, multilateral institutions, and technical partners. Each route uses the enquiry form with the correct topic for governance-grade routing.
Route · 01
Governments
National and municipal authorities: sequenced steps from expression of interest to governance approval.
Entry portalRoute · 02
EU & IFIs
European institutions and multilateral banks: due diligence, capital architecture, and document library access.
Structured entryRoute · 03
Technical partners
Engineering, advisory, and supplier engagement through competitive frameworks — not informal commercial prospecting.
Framework entryStandards Framework
Reconstruction succeeds when standards outlast individual projects. Published titles and version indices (illustrative v1.0 baseline — consult the library for adoption status).
- Housing Reconstruction Standard — v1.0
- Modular & Industrialised Housing Standard — v1.0
- Durability & Lifecycle Standard — v1.0
- Water & Wastewater Infrastructure Standard — v1.0
- Transport & Access Infrastructure Standard — v1.0
- Public Utilities Reconstruction Standard — v1.0
- Grid Resilience & Recovery Standard — v1.0
- Distributed Energy & Storage Standard — v1.0
- Energy Efficiency & Retrofit Standard — v1.0
- Environmental Safeguards Standard — v1.0
- Community Impact & Resettlement Standard — v1.0
- Accessibility & Inclusion Standard — v1.0
- Procurement & Tendering Standard — v1.0
- Anti-Corruption & Compliance Standard — v1.0
- Project SPV Governance Standard — v1.0
Reconstruction Is Not Construction
Why institutional design, standards, and governance must precede funding and delivery at national scale — a short strategic read for boards and diligence teams.
- Why reconstruction is institutional, not a project portfolio
- Why fragmented delivery fails at scale
- Why standards must precede funding
- Why governance precedes execution
Reconstruction ecosystem
Working across the reconstruction ecosystem
The Authority is designed to operate alongside multilateral institutions, development finance, and technical delivery partners — under transparent, governance-grade frameworks.
Multilateral & Financial Institutions
Anchor capital & standards
World Bank
European Investment Bank (EIB)
EBRD
EU institutions & IFIs
Senior and anchor capital under established due-diligence frameworks.
View partner directory
Engineering & Technical Firms
Design, supervision & delivery
Engineering & design supervision
Environmental & standards advisers
Technical delivery partners
Quality-assurance specialists
Engaged through framework agreements and competitive procurement.
Engagement routes
Private Sector & Investors
To be announced
Partner opportunities available as the Authority moves to live programmes.
Express interest
Representative organisations within the reconstruction ecosystem · Partnership status subject to confirmation.
Partnership
Become a partner in Ukraine’s reconstruction
Governments, multilateral institutions, financiers, engineering and technical firms are invited to engage with the Authority. Register your interest and our partnerships team will respond under the appropriate governance and due-diligence framework.
Expressions of interest only. Partnership status is subject to confirmation under the Authority’s governance and eligibility frameworks.
Document Centre
Latest Institutional Documents
Published frameworks, governance documents, and reports — with category, version, and status. Only documents adopted through governance are authoritative.
Legal & Institutional
Founding Charter
Published · v1.0
Governance & Oversight
Governance & Oversight Framework
Illustrative · pending approval
Capital & Funding
Capital Architecture Overview
Illustrative · pending approval
Reconstruction Standards
Reconstruction Standards Index
Illustrative · v1.0 baseline
Illustrative listing. Document titles and statuses are placeholders pending governance approval.
Accountability & Reporting
Annual Reports
Published on a fixed institutional cycle — a single, comparable record of governance, capital safeguards, reconstruction delivery, and independent assurance.
- Governance & oversight
- Capital & funding
- Programme delivery
- Audit & assurance
Illustrative covers. The Authority is in institutional formation — reports are placeholders pending governance adoption and external assurance.
Newsroom
News & Briefings
Institutional updates, briefings, and statements. Published under the Authority’s communications governance.
Briefing
June 2026
Institutional framework and governance architecture published
Lire la suite →
Statement
May 2026
Authority outlines capital separation and oversight principles
Lire la suite →
Mettre à jour
May 2026
Reconstruction standards baseline released for consultation
Lire la suite →Illustrative items. Headlines are placeholders pending publication.
Partners & public authorities
Work with the Authority through structured institutional channels
Governments, EU and IFI partners, and technical organisations use separate entry routes so enquiries can be assessed under the right governance, eligibility, and due-diligence framework.
